https://sites.google.com/view/planetarydiameters-edci335/home
Category: edci335
Blog Post #2
Abin’s Blog Post #2: My Peer Comment
Great post! I really appreciated your breakdown of how direct instruction strips away the active ‘discovery phase’ required for conceptual understanding. I am addressing a similar barrier in my individual blueprint on the Diameters of the Planets in our Solar System. Much like your ‘Solving for Why’ project, textbooks often visually distort planetary scales to fit a page, causing massive misconceptions. Reading your analysis reinforced why I chose an experiential learning framework over traditional methods. Grounding abstract astronomical metrics in local spatial anchors (like scaling up from a middle school gym court to the landmass of Canada) forces students to actively adapt their mental models through physical context rather than memorizing procedures. Your point about short, scaffolded moments of explicit instruction on Nearpod was also highly relevant; I plan to use a similar strategy when introducing base units on Google Sites before letting students work with relative scale variables!
Sasha’s Blog Post #2: My Peer Comment
Hi Sasha, great post! I really resonated with your points about how experiential learning enables students to actively construct meaning from their own experiences rather than passively receiving information. In my individual project on the Diameters of the Planets in our Solar System, I am tackling a similar pedagogical challenge.
Textbooks often visually distort planetary scales to fit on a single screen, which leaves middle schoolers with the false impression that planetary dimensions are relatively uniform. Reading your analysis reinforced my decision to use an experiential learning framework on my Google Sites launchpad. By grounding these massive, abstract astronomical diameters in local, physical realities—like scaling up from a Victoria middle school gym court to the landmass of Canada—students have to actively manipulate and adapt their mental models based on concrete contexts. Your discussion on how students create meaning through reflection on doing perfectly aligns with how I plan to structure my interactive ‘Cosmic Measurement Chart’ to build real spatial reasoning. Thanks for sharing your insights!
Blog Post #3
Sneh Duggal’s Blog Post #3: My Peer Comment
Hi Sneh! I really appreciated your analysis of how the concept of the ‘average learner’ distorts modern educational systems. Your point about how standardized metrics fail to capture true student diversity completely aligns with the hurdles I found while constructing my design on the Diameters of the Planets in our Solar System. Traditional planetary curricula implicitly assume an ‘average reader’ who possesses uniform spatial reasoning skills, entirely shutting out students who struggle with abstract ideas, like astronomical data. As with your insights, I am designing a Google Sites page that will hopefully successfully integrate Universal Design for Learning by providing multiple paths of representation (like text, audio, and visual formats). Building systemic flexibility upfront honors learner variability from day one, rather than trying to fix rigid instruction through awkward retroactive modifications. Thank you for a thought-provoking post!
Blog Post #4
Manveen Kaur’s Blog Post #4: My Peer Comment
Hi Manveen! Great post! I really appreciated your deep dive into how intentional video curation can shift students from passive media consumers into active analytical thinkers. Your point about using focused instructional video clips alongside structured data tracking gives me so many ideas that align with the interactive framework I am building for my individual blueprint on the Diameters of the Planets in our Solar System.
Because raw video broadcasts lack inherent interaction, reading your analysis reinforced why I am relying heavily on learner-generated interactions—such as prompting middle schoolers to interact with the media, track relative proportions, and actively adjust their internal mental models. Your idea of pairing video analysis with an immediate follow-up data task directly influenced my post-concept activities, where students use Google Sites interactive tools to map abstract planetary diameters using spatial anchors (like the physical landmass of Canada). Connecting short, high-density videos to hands-on geometric data processing is exactly how we bridge the gap between abstract cosmic concepts and realistic concrete reasoning. Thank you for a thought-provoking post!
Integrating dynamic media elements into interactive lessons allows educators to transform passive content consumption into active, relational conceptualization. Building on the interactive Google Sites framework from my Blog Post #2 and the multi-modal universal design scaffolds from Blog Post #3, I selected the Khan Academy Scale of Earth and Sun Video to explicitly expose textbook size distortions. Educational alignment requires that learning tools directly reinforce our target curricular fusion: bridging BC Science 6 celestial scale concepts with Math 6/7 geometric spatial reasoning.
Inherent and Learner-Generated Interaction (Prompts 1 & 2)
The video relies heavily on relational, mathematical scales. This structure lacks immediate inherent interaction because the raw broadcast format does not halt playback to demand student inputs. To bypass this baseline constraint, the video functions as a catalyst for learner-generated interaction. Middle school students can naturally pause the stream, sketch physical diameter line-ups, and make comparative notes. Bates (2022) explains in Teaching in a Digital Age Chapter 10.6 that an educational video’s real pedagogical power lies in its capacity to challenge structural mental models. It forces learners to actively process real-world spatial configurations rather than consuming data passively.
Post-Video Extension and Formative Feedback (Prompts 3 & 4)
Following the media segment, students complete a digital follow-up task titled “Ranking the Planets.” Using the interactive tools on the Google Sites platform, students apply mathematical scale factors. They transform planetary dimensions into local, regional, and national units, comparing various sizes building up to ratios used against the landmass of Canada. This applied task matches the frameworks explored by Kaur (2026). Her work proved that pairing focused instructional video clips with contextual data tracking anchors abstract mathematical relationships to realistic concrete frameworks.
To evaluate this task, students would receive feedback through interactive real-time marking; Google Sites allows for preset answers to be given based on the outcome of the learner’s interaction. These results can then be recorded for future reference. This medium allows peers to review each other’s spatial understandings and identify scaling anomalies, while an instructor can provide immediate feedback on spatial calibration errors referencing the results of the preset answers.
Inclusive Design and Spatial Accessibility (Prompt 7)
To address systemic learning barriers, the video is wrapped in a multi-modal delivery structure. The framework includes native closed captions, variable playback speeds, and a complete text transcript. These adjustments decrease working memory stress. They provide critical pacing flexibility for students building foundational mathematical competencies. By providing these forms of accessible pathways, my module would be able to accommodate human variability natively and eliminate the need for retroactive learning adjustments.
Figure 1
Terrestrial Planet Size Comparisons.
Note. From Wikimedia Commons Asset Landing Page. In the public domain.
References
Bates, A. W. (2022). Chapter 10.6: Interaction. In Teaching in a Digital Age (3rd ed.). BCcampus. bccampus.ca
Kaur, M. (2026, June 20). Blogpost 4 : Using Video for Interaction. Manveen Kaur’s EDCI 335 Blog. https://manv.opened.ca/blogpost-4-using-video-for-interaction/
Khan Academy. (n.d.). Scale of Earth and Sun [Video]. Cosmology and Astronomy. khanacademy.org
NASA. (2006). Terrestrial planet size comparisons [Digital graphic]. Wikimedia Commons. wikimedia.org
Confronting the Myth of the “Average Learner” through Universal Design using Astronomy
Educational planning traditionally defaults to a mythical “average learner,” forcing students who deviate from this arbitrary baseline to rely on retroactive accommodations. As the Inclusive Design Research Centre argues, assuming human variability as the normal starting condition transforms accessibility from an afterthought into a proactive structural design process (EDCI 335, 2023a). For my learning design blueprint, “The Diameters of the Planets in our Solar System,” expecting learner variability is crucial. Middle schoolers vary wildly in their mathematical competencies, spatial reasoning, and working memory capacities. Designing a static, one-size-fits-all lesson would inadvertently construct systemic learning barriers, especially when asking Grade 6–7 students to process massive numbers and scale factors.
Abstract Tech Network
Figure 1
Visualizing diverse, non-linear cognitive learner networks.
Note. From Wikimedia Commons – Network Visualization File Page
To eliminate these barriers, my Google Sites module implements Universal Design for Learning (UDL) by focusing on the limitations of the design rather than the perceived limitations of the students (EDCI 335, 2023b). For example, a major hurdle in astronomy science is the intense cognitive load caused by raw mathematical dimensions. Rather than expecting an “average” reader to go through complex text, the module features a simplified “Cosmic Measurement Chart” that utilizes layered representation (Department of Physics and Astronomy at Douglas College & OpenStax, 2017). Students can engage with the data via a high-contrast localized text chart, visuals that stack Earth Units (EU) across a planet’s face, audio to compliment the visuals, and the ability to organize their understanding by means of interactive scaffolding (an interactive step-by-step framework to guide them towards the larger concept).
Planet Jupiter in Space
Figure 2
True atmospheric structures and authentic planetary scale.
Note. From NASA Science – Jupiter Near-Infrared Composite Asset Page.
This structural inclusivity mirrors the ideas explored by my classmates. In their post on the myth of standard grading, Sneh Duggal (2026) detailed how traditional systems prioritize a fictitious average student, hiding real human diversity behind rigid, standardized expectations. This directly supports my choice of experiential learning; building upon Sasha’s peer post from our previous unit, flexibility in hands-on exploration allows diverse minds to actively construct unique meaning instead of forcing them down a single linear pathway. By providing multiple pathways for engagement and representation, I’m hoping my blueprint can show that you can design systems that work for everyone’s different needs while avoiding the treatment of accessibility like a special favour added on later; you can build it right into the foundation from the very beginning.
Exploration of Spatial Scales
Figure 3
Middle school students actively interacting with collaborative science tools.
Note. From Wikimedia Commons – Ramstein Middle School Science Investigation Page.
References
Anugraheni, I., Gufron, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2025). The impact of realistic problem-based learning on mathematical connection abilities: Evidence from elementary schools in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1). doi.org
Coştu, F., Özdemir, N. F., & Coştu, B. (2022). Revealing middle school students’ understanding of the universe: Alternative conceptions of scale and size. Journal of Education in Science, Environmental and Health, 8(4), 312-326. ed.gov
Department of Physics and Astronomy at Douglas College & OpenStax. (2017). Douglas College Astronomy 1105. BCcampus Open Education. bccampus.ca
Duggal, S. (2026, June 6). Blog Post #3- Prompt 6: Where do you see the idea of the “average learner” shaping educational design? Sneh’s EDCI 335 Blog. https://snehduggal.opened.ca/2026/06/06/blog-post-3-prompt-6-where-do-you-see-the-idea-of-the-average-learner-shaping-educational-design/
EDCI 335. (2023a). Inclusive learning design. Learning Design for Technology-Mediated Environments. edtechuvic.ca
EDCI 335. (2023b). Universal design. Learning Design for Technology-Mediated Environments. edtechuvic.ca
Martin, F. (2021). Network visualization [Digital graphic]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Network_Visualization.png
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2007). Jupiter and Io [Photograph]. NASA Science. https://science.nasa.gov/resource/jupiter-and-io/
Price, A., Lee, H., Malatesta, K., & SubbaRao, M. (2017). Learning about the scale of the solar system using digital planetarium visualizations and physical scaling. American Journal of Physics, 85(7), 550-559. doi.org
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Europe District. (2013). Ramstein students become environmental detectives for a day [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ramstein_Students_Become_Environmental_Detectives_for_a_Day_(9628644).jpg
Unmasking Cosmic Distortion: Experiential Scaling in Middle School Space Science
Textbook curriculums frequently rely on visual distortions to squeeze our vast solar system onto a single page, not knowingly creating deep spatial misconceptions leading to middle schoolers assuming planetary diameters are uniform (Coştu et al., 2022; Price et al., 2017). Furthermore, due to an egocentric bias from Earth’s surface, young learners assume the Earth, Moon, and Sun are roughly comparable in size (Baybars, 2018). For my individual learning design blueprint, “The Diameters of the Planets in our Solar System,” relying on direct instruction would fail to challenge these faulty mental models. Instead, an applied learning framework turns abstract numbers into tangible terms by encouraging students to adapt their mental models through active reflection and physical manipulation. Traditional methods fail to help learners link abstract concepts to real-world contexts, but context-driven applied tasks effectively bridge the gap between mathematical procedures and physical reality (Anugraheni et al., 2025).
Geographic Scaling Baseline
Figure 1
Greater Victoria Map
Note. From Greater Victoria Map [Map], by Vancouver Island Travel, 2013, VancouverIsland.com (vancouverisland.com). Copyright 2013 by Vancouver Island Travel.
In technology-mediated environments, digital design choices directly dictate how theory becomes practice. By creating this resource on Google Sites, I am providing an interactive launchpad that avoids cognitive overload. As emphasized in the EDCI 335 Learning, Motivation, and Theory unit, constructivist learning environments require students to apply cognitive effort to adjust internal relational understanding rather than passively testing recall (EDCI 335, 2023b). Rather than reviewing static metrics, students reference a simplified “Cosmic Measurement Chart” curated from open-source data (Department of Physics and Astronomy at Douglas College & OpenStax, 2017). Students practice active scaling, progressing from a Victoria middle school gym court up to the landmass of Canada, anchoring Earth’s diameter as a baseline unit of 1.0 Earth Unit (EU) to solve geometric problems (Krawec, 2014; Merrill, 2018).
True Celestial Proportions
Figure 2
Solar System Sizes Lineup
Note. From Solar System Sizes [Digital image], by NASA Science, 2023, NASA Solar System Exploration (nasa.gov). In the public domain.
While analyzing this design individually (no other members in my pod), my framework directly contrasts with some of the alternative models researched by peers in other pods. For instance, in the “Solving for Why” Blog Post, a classmate analyzed why direct instruction falls short when teaching spatial and algebraic reasoning, noting that static lectures fail to help students make meaningful connections (Anugraheni et al., 2025). This directly supports my choice of experiential learning; and as Sasha highlighted in her peer post, students must actively create meaning from their own experiences rather than passively receiving procedures. By prioritizing interactive media over static lectures, this module meets the multiple means of representation prioritized in the EDCI 335 Learning Design I framework for universal design, fostering critical spatial reasoning for all learners (EDCI 335, 2023a).
Collaborative Learning in Action
Figure 3
Middle School Astronomy Activities
Note. From Unveiling the Wonders of Space: 5 Astronomy Activities for Middle Schoolers [Photograph], by National STEM Honor Society, 2023, NSTEM (nstem.org). Copyright 2023 by National STEM Honor Society.
References
Anugraheni, I., Gufron, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2025). The impact of realistic problem-based learning on mathematical connection abilities: Evidence from elementary schools in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1). doi.org
Baybars, M. G. (2018). Middle school students’ misconceptions about the concepts of astronomy: A developmental comparison. International Education Studies, 11(11), 34-46. ed.gov
British Columbia Ministry of Education and Child Care. (2016a). Mathematics 6 & 7: Curricular competencies and content. BC Curricula. gov.bc.ca
British Columbia Ministry of Education and Child Care. (2016b). Science 6: Curricular competencies and content. BC Curricula. gov.bc.ca
Coştu, F., Özdemir, N. F., & Coştu, B. (2022). Revealing middle school students’ understanding of the universe: Alternative conceptions of scale and size. Journal of Education in Science, Environmental and Health, 8(4), 312-326. ed.gov
Department of Physics and Astronomy at Douglas College & OpenStax. (2017). Douglas College Astronomy 1105. BCcampus Open Education. bccampus.ca
EDCI 335. (2023a). Learning Design I: Universal design for learning. Learning Design for Technology-Mediated Environments. edtechuvic.ca
EDCI 335. (2023b). Learning, motivation, and theory: Learning theories. Learning Design for Technology-Mediated Environments. edtechuvic.ca
Krawec, J. (2014). Improving middle school students’ geometry problem solving and spatial reasoning through integrated curriculum modules. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 415-430. doi.org
Merrill, M. D. (2018). Using the First Principles of Instruction to make instruction effective, efficient, and engaging. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology (1st ed., pp. 265-275). EdTech Books. edtechbooks.org
NASA Science. (2023). Solar system sizes [Digital image]. NASA Solar System Exploration. nasa.gov
National STEM Honor Society. (2023). Unveiling the wonders of space: 5 astronomy activities for middle schoolers [Photograph]. NSTEM. nstem.org
Price, A., Lee, H., Malatesta, K., & SubbaRao, M. (2017). Learning about the scale of the solar system using digital planetarium visualizations and physical scaling. American Journal of Physics, 85(7), 550-559. doi.org
Vancouver Island Travel. (2013). Greater Victoria map [Map]. VancouverIsland.com. vancouverisland.com
For my first Blog Post I decided to go with Option #1: Motivation Autopsy. I chose this option because I have experience using the Khan Academy online learning application provided through Sal Khan’s website by the same name (Khan Academy).
I was initially introduced to the website while searching YouTube for videos on Physics topics. This was before I actually started my BSc in Physics and it was the perfect portal/tool for me to get stronger in understanding the Physics concepts I was seeking. Once I started my degree I found that it dramatically contributed to my early success; Specifically years 1 and 2. However, my motivation towards using it as a constant tool started to drop near the beginning of my second year because the weight of my course materials started to leave less and less room for supplementary materials.
I officially stopped using it near the beginning of my third year because the relevance started to fade. As my courses got more technical with mathematical rigor and the scope of the concepts, the Khan Academy learning application started to fall short with what it provided in regards to what I was learning; The options started to get less relevant to what I needed. I feel like if they focused on completing each area of study before introducing more areas that take staff time and effort (including pay) they could have had material to support a learner from start to finish.
Although it slightly lacks depth in certain areas of study, I feel like it overall has a perfect system for learners wanting to gain knowledge in a multitude of areas for study. It has many positive aspects of how it presents its lessons and how it structures its feedback. A really good example of how I feel the team at Khan Academy has had success is their ability to anchor the learning within a meaningful context. In the Physics area of study they do this by teaching new concepts by connecting them to real life scenarios that would have familiarity within the mind of the learner rather than using something solely abstract. It gives the learner a conceptual “anchor” to relate to which ultimately I believe makes the information easier to understand and remember.
Welcome to my page. My name is James (can call me JD if you’d like) and I am currently a student attending the University of Victoria.
I recently just finished my BSc in Physics but I am en route towards my next educational goal which is part of the reason I am enrolled in Summer courses.
I am new to this form of learning and this area of study in general but I am eager to learn and experience new things; So, here we are.
.jpg){kind=link}
This post will appear in a few places:
- in the blog feed on the front of your website
- in the Learning Design menu on your website. This is because we have applied the “edci335” category to this post and the menu item “Learning Design” has been created from the category “edci335.” For every post you make for this course, please assign the “edci335” category to it. You are welcome to use this blog for your personal hobbies or for other courses, in which case, you could create additional menu items and categories for them.
- if you give permission, your posts categorized “edci335” will be aggregated onto the Blog Feed on the EDCI 335 Course Website.
Feel free to delete this post once you understand this. If you have any questions, please reach out to your instructor.
Recent Comments